Direct answer: intergranular corrosion is controlled by managing alloy selection, thermal exposure, welding procedure, heat treatment and contamination—not by a single cleaning or passivation step.
Exposure within a sensitizing temperature range can allow chromium-rich carbides to form at grain boundaries in some stainless grades. The adjacent chromium-depleted regions may then corrode preferentially in a suitable environment. Welding, slow cooling, repeated heat cycles and high-temperature service can all influence susceptibility.
Low-carbon L grades reduce the carbon available for chromium-carbide precipitation. Stabilized grades use elements such as titanium or niobium to bind carbon under controlled processing. Neither approach removes the need to evaluate service temperature, welding, product specification and the actual corrosion environment.
A qualified solution heat treatment may dissolve detrimental precipitates and restore corrosion resistance, followed by appropriate cooling. The cycle depends on grade, product form and governing specification; it should not be copied as one universal temperature and hold time.
ASTM A262 practices are used to detect susceptibility to intergranular attack in austenitic stainless steels, but different practices answer different questions. Other alloy families and service conditions may require other standards. State the grade, product form, heat-treatment condition, sampling location and acceptance criterion in the order.